
Frank Shepard Fairey, more commonly known as Shepard Fairey, is a street artist who was born in Charleston, South Carolina on February 15, 1970. Rather than following in his father’s footsteps as a physician, Fairey chose to pursue his dream of becoming an artist. His rebellious spirit and love for skateboarding was evident at a young age. At one point, Fairey even dropped out of high school after he was told he could not wear his favorite pair of Vans sneakers to school. Nevertheless, he eventually completed high school at the Idyllwild School of Music and the Arts, and furthered his education at a well-known and competitive institution, the Rhode Island School of Design. While working on a bachelor’s degree of fine arts, he started a part-time job at a skateboarding shop, where the direction for his “guerrilla art” originated. It was at this time in Fairey’s life that he began to create stencils, after a friend had asked him to do so. He was quickly inspired by these stencils, and decided to take his new found passion to the streets. This move not only marked the beginning of his career, but his criminal record as well.
In 1989, Shepard Fairey began a sticker campaign called “Andre the Giant has a Posse,” which later evolved into his renowned “Obey Giant” campaign. This work featured Andre the Giant, a deceased wrestling superstar. What started as a crude joke directed at skater and hip-hop culture in Providence, Rhode Island, quickly spread all over the eastern United States by the
early 1990s. These images were eventually spread to many urban centers all over the world. His work even inspired the creation of a documentary entitled “Andre the Giant has a Posse” by Helen Stickler. In 1995, Fairey combined this popular image with the word “Obey” after Titan Sports, Inc. threatened to sue him for using their trademarked name, “Andre the Giant.” This campaign represented the beginning of countless rebellious acts as he traveled from Providence to Boston and New York spreading his “propaganda” and frequently getting arrested for vandalism in the process.
him to continue to pursue his passion of street art. As his business continued to grow, he finally made the move from Providence, Rhode Island to San Diego, California in 1996. With partners Dave Kinsey and Phillip De Wolff, he formed a branding, marketing, and design company that targeted the action sports market, and was known as FBI, or First Bureau of Imagery. The rapid collapse of this firm led these entrepreneurs to open BLK/MRKT in 1999, which proved to be a much greater success. As the company expanded, it was moved from San Diego to Los Angeles, and even included a small art gallery. Fairey’s career was finally gaining momentum, and so was his love life. In 2001, Fairey married Amanda Ayala who became another business partner. Finally, in 2003, he was able to establish a professional split from Kinsey and take over the company, which he renamed Studio Number One.
Today, the reputation of Shepard Fairey has never been higher, thanks to a political piece inspired by Barack Obama. Fairey had been an avid fan of Obama for several years, which led him to create a series of work during the 2008 presidential campaign. In January 2008, Fairey literally created the posters overnight and began distributing them throughout America. The first screenprint poster was entitled Obama Progress, which quickly evolved into Obama Hope. This well-known piece was identical to the first, with the exception of the word “Progress” being replaced with “Hope.”
The series was based on an abstract portrayal of President Obama colored in red, white, and blue, and was immediately recognized by the public. The artwork was gaining popularity so rapidly that it was even noticed by Obama himself, who expressed his appreciation for Fairey in a letter shortly after the poster was released. This overnight success even scored Shepard Fairey a decent seat at the inauguration ceremony, of which he was very honored to attend. Life seemed to be going just perfect for the striving young artist at this point, but little did he know the beginning of his downfall was right around the corner.
Supporters of Fairey’s work label the Obama Hope poster as an inspiration, one that captures Obama’s ideals and potential as a strong leader for America. The popularity of this graphic metaphor exploded because it was able to visually communicate the “hope” these people had been searching for. However, many individuals are now beginning to question the authenticity of this hope. As it turns out, the portrait illustration for Fairey’s legendary poster series was based on a photograph taken by Mannie Garcia, while working for the Associated Press. In fact, the two portraits look virtually identical when they are compared side-by-side.
The obvious resemblance between these two works has instigated a considerable amount of controversy within the art community. If one closely observes the collection of work credited to the infamous Shepard Fairey, it quickly becomes evident that none of his work is truly original. For years, he has used the work of others as a template for his own. Many believe that he has taken the idea of “stenciling” much too far. This debate has left many unanswered questions on the minds of critics and enthusiasts alike. Should Shepard Fairey be labeled as an artist or a plagiarist? And if his designs are to be considered artwork, should the original artist benefit from Fairey’s work as well? According to AP, he is guilty of copyright infringement. The news agency has recently filed a lawsuit against Fairey, demanding an undisclosed amount of compensation for the copyrighted photograph that served as the basis for the Obama campaign posters.
Nevertheless, Shepard Fairey’s criminal record does not stop there. He recently admitted to the Boston Globe that he has been arrested at least 14 times. One of his most recent arrests occurred in February 2009 on the way to the opening night party for his exhibit at the Institute of Contemporary Art. In July 2009, he was sentenced to two years’ probation for images he had illegally posted on both public and private property. In this court case, he pleaded guilty to three charges of vandalism, while 11 other charges were dropped. Fairey was also fined $2000 to pay for the removal of the graffiti. Meanwhile, the dispute regarding the 2006 AP Photograph still stands as unresolved. Even after all these criminal charges, Shepard Fairey continues to vandalize the streets of America with graffiti he likes to call guerrilla art. He justifies his actions with the claim that “freedom of expression is the bedrock of our democracy” (Fairey).
Bibliography
Caruso, Hwa Young. "The Art of Shepard Fairey: Questioning Everything." International Journal of Multicultural Education: 10(2008).
Fairey, Shepard. Obey: Supply & Demand,
The Art of Shepard Fairey. 2006.
Gaskell, Ivan. "Shepard Fairey." ArtUS. 26(2008): 42-43.
Harris, Rachel. "Shepard Fairey Gets Probation."
New York Times. 13 July 2009.
Valencia, Milton. "Street Artist Arrested on Way to Event at ICA." Boston Globe. 7 February 2009.
Vallen, Mark. "Obey Plagiarist Shepard Fairey." Art for a
Change. December 2007.

You definitely brought up some great points in your essay. I read about the Obama Hope poster controversy on the Adbusters website and feel much the same way you do. I think it is dishonest to not credit the art that you are altering for your own fame and fortune. According to Fairey's attorney, Fairey altered the photographic image enough to avoid copyright infringement-- which is something that is hard for us to get when we don't the definition of "alteration" and the percentage of alteration that the copyright laws are based on. I think Fairey should give the AP photographer a percentage of the money he has made off of the poster just to be fair, even if what he did was legal because without the photograph Fairey might not have been able to create an image with the same aesthetic quality.
ReplyDeleteI also know that Fairey is holding a contest in Tucson with a September deadline for the person who can come up with a new design for him. The prize is like $500 or $2000 or something like that & I know people who refuse to enter the competition because they know that once they give Fairey their image he has the resources to reproduce and distribute that image and make way more money off it than he is paying for the design contest winner. I understand that for some people having a line on their resume that says their design got picked up by Shepard Fairey is worth the letting go of their art, but I also understand that there is a certain amount of pride that goes into creating something that is uniquely yours and was not copied from someone else and that you will keep for yourself because it represents your skills and not how much you're willing to pay someone to take that away from you.
Thanks Karissa for this article. I was surprised about the information that you mentioned in this article. As you said, does the work of Shepard Fairey instill the message of hope or distrust? This reminds me with the wolf story. The man who was lying to people saying that there is a wolf coming.
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed this research project. I didnt know that it was Shepard Fairey who designed both Obama's poster and Obey Clothing. The Obama poster was his main source of propaganda. The hope poster was everywhere in commercials, stickers, posters, and even t-shirts. Many people believe that this helped Obama win his campaign with this great deisgn and slogan. Also i own many Obey clothing items and love the designs of them all. Obey clothing has great designs and I have always been a fan of it. You did a great job explaining his life and his works of art.
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed reading your paper! You did a wonderful job on it and I can tell you did your homework :-). I felt like I learned a lot from reading your paper, especially because Shepard Fairey is still active today. I see tons of people on campus at the University of Arizona in Obey clothing, yet I never knew who was behind the brand. Thank you for informing me of new fun facts! Again, excellent job on your paper.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteNot trying to be mean, I'm an art student so I'm used to giving people a lot of criticism on their stuff, and receiving it as well. This paper, while very compelling, was supposed to be a research paper. Instead, it is completely biased and accusatory, which detracts from all the information you're trying to give to the reader. Since I'm commenting on a very opinionated paper, I'll give my own opinion on the matter. The law, I believe, states that if you alter a work of art or anything copyrighted 51% or more, it is considered your own art, and there is no copyright infringement. Shepard Fairey definitely altered 51%+ of this photograph. He cropped it, changed the color scheme, the levels, the contrast, the background, smoothed all the edges, and added his own typeface to the bottom. This is definitely his own work of art. It would be like drawing a picture of a sculpture you see in the park. Actually, there is a quite famous photographer (his name has slipped my mind at the moment) who photographs images on his TV in creative ways. Although he photographs someone else's video work, he turns it into his own piece. It kind of disturbed me that you were so blunt about Shepard Fairey being a thief and a liar. Such bold statements about the illegality and morals of his work, and your negative approach to explaining the artist himself, have nothing to do with how good of an artist he is, or his particular design method.
ReplyDelete